Cutting The Branch

I feel a bit like we're being sort of an abusive boyfriend.
Going: you can't leave us. You leave us, you've got nothing, love.
(Jimmy Carr on Scottish Independence, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, Youssou N'Dour, 1989

We’ve been together with Scotland for 300 years

If we broke up, it’s like your nanna and grandad breaking up

What’s the point? Just shuffle along towards the end

(Jimmy Carr, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

Before we move to the heart of the matter and look at the latest batch of Scottish polls, let's examine first what should have remained a side issue, but has been turned into a key issue by some both within and outwith the SNP, usually with extremely conflicting views. You surely know already what I'm referring to here: gender politics, or identity politics, just use the description you like best. And of course its proposed legal consequential: reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 including unsupervised and unchallenged gender self-identification. You already know where I stand here and this is definitely not about my own opinion, but where Scottish public opinion stands. To the best of my knowledge, support and opposition to the SNP's GRA reform has been surveyed twice so far. First in October 2019 by Panelbase on behalf of Bathman... oops... sorry... Wings Over Scotland, and the wording of the question can be described as strongly biased to elicit the strongest opposition. Then in February this year by Savanta Comres as part as their Scottish Tracker for The Scotsman, with a wording you might consider halfway between neutral and biased towards supporting the reform. In both cases, my hunch is that the explicit or implicit bias failed to have a massive effect and probably just boosted the 'neutral' tier of the answers. Both polls explicitly mentioned access to single-sex spaces, which is one of the key issues for opponents of the reform, and probably the most sensitive for the general population. But it has been at the core of feminist opposition right from the start and triggered the most passionate reactions, so I doubt even painting it in the most negative way would seriously influence the outcome, simply because most people already feel strongly about it one way or the other. So now bear with me for a moment as I score a massive own goal with those results. First the headline results from the general population, crosstabbed with the usual basic demographics.

Savanta Comres used a straightforward five-tier scale from 'strongly oppose' to 'strongly support'. Panelbase used a 0-10 scale which I mapped as: 0-1 = strongly oppose, 2-3 = somewhat oppose, 4-5-6 = neutral, 7-8 = somewhat support, 9-10 = strongly support. And here you have it: support for the GRA reform has increased during the sixteen months between the two polls. Most noticeably among the Zoomers and Millennials, which comes as a surprise only if you haven't been paying attention, or stayed off social media since Tony Blair resigned. And I honestly don't feel even a wee smitch bad for being at odds with the majority of my own generation. More surprisingly, support has also increased faster than average among women. I guess you can pin that one on the younger lasses who have only an approximate knowledge of what the fight for women's rights was all about. And, before you even think of saying it, this is not a sexist remark. Just stating the obvious fact that sometimes people take some situations for granted, and fail to identify what might be a threat to hard-earned rights. Like a Deliveroo biker agreeing to be labelled 'self-employed' and then whining he can't get union protection when they deny him sick pay. Which is definitely the kind of sentence that makes me sound like an old fart, but never mind. More relevantly, Savanta Comres crosstabbed the question with political affiliation, based on votes at the December 2019 general election.

So SNP voters massively support GRA reform and self-id, significantly more than any other political tribe in Scotland. Though 'Other' here includes anything from UKIP to Green voters, and you would probably find a similar level of support, if not higher, if Green voters were counted separately. Also note that the quadrant of the political compass from which the SNP are most likely to draw extra voters, if any, the Labour electorate, is also highly supportive of GRA and self-id. And, though we lack crosstabs on that, the part of the Labour electorate most likely to switch to the SNP, young pro-Indy Labour voters, are certainly more supportive than the average Labour voter. And quite likely more supportive than the average SNP voter too, if we infer that from the basic demographic crosstabs of the general population. It definitely sounds like a lot of people are totally ignoring the SNP's antics on this issue, no matter where they may lead, and have totally bought the soundbite that we must "keep our eyes on the prize". That is Independence, which might not be such a sure prospect as we wanted to think it was six months ago, but we'll have more on that later. So, if gender politics are not a vote killer and might even be a vote gainer, we have to look elsewhere for an explanation of the SNP's current woes. And we all know where to look, don't we? If there's a lesson to be learned from the ongoing farce, it's that those who told us to suck it up and wheesht for Indy should have applied that to themselves first. And not waited for a Panelbase poll that says 29% of Scots are less likely to vote for the SNP now, and only 14% are more likely. It's too late to say 'Oops!' now, because you just realised that all this time you've been cutting the branch you're sitting on. Be seeing you after the election, lads.

Scottish Independence was a big story

Part of me thought it would be a tremendous idea

Telling my kids that we’re going abroad and then taking them to Dunfermline

(Sean Lock, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, 1992

The only person who stood their ground the entire time was Nicola Sturgeon

She’s amazing. She came out in Parliament and she said:

“I’m not going to go back on what I said because some think it was awful at the time”

“And that wouldn’t be the sort of person I am”

That’s what we need in this country: a good Scottish woman

(Aisling Bea on the EU referendum, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2016)

Another key factor in the election will be Nicola Sturgeon's own favourability ratings, because you can't escape the quasi-presidential component of parliamentary elections under the Westminster System which, like it or not, is the template for the governance of Scotland. A lot hinges on how much you trust the winning party's leader and, in Nicola's case, you might say how much faith you have in her. Because, like it or not again, there is a cult element about her. Which is not an isolated case, there is one about Boris Johnson too, there was one about Donald Trump, Jeremy Corbyn, Tony Blair and Alex Salmond too before that. Just to make it clear, I definitely do not mean that in a derogatory sense, just as an acknowledgment of a pretty common phenomenon in highly personalised politics. And in that respect, Nicola Sturgeon has succeeded way beyond what anyone possibly thought possible when she became First Minister in 2014. Two major pollsters, Opinium and Redfield & Wilton, have surveyed Nicola's ratings continuously since the beginning of 2020. Both phrase the question as approving or disapproving of her performance in her job, which obviously strongly reduces the 'beauty contest' bias you always have in that sort of survey. And the overall result is quite stunning.

To cut the long story short, Nicola Sturgeon has a higher level of approval among British public opinion than the leaders of the three main English parties. Better than Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer or Ed Davey. She's even the only one of the four major leaders with a net positive rating continuously from late March 2020 to early March 2021. Just bear in mind these figures include Welsh and British voters, so you can't rule out some ambiguity in what 'approve' actually means for them. Maybe some approve her for fumbling the case for Independence, and why wouldn't they? Then what matters more is what Scots think of Nicola's performance, which has to be a mix of her as First Minister and her as leader of the SNP. And it's really good too, except for an unexpected twist at the end. In Redfield & Wilton's first March poll, Nicola got a net -2% in Scotland, her first net negative since the beginning of the Covid crisis, while she still enjoyed a net +4% overall. So, for one fleeting moment, she was more popular in England than in Scotland. Don't ask me why, it's all in the numbers and numbers don't lie, do they? That is, until they do. And anyway Nicola was back to a net +11% in Scotland in the second March poll, which is definitely not as spectacular as in the past, while dipping to +2% overall. Which is her worst result with the general UK population since April 2020. Not that I want to pour salt and vinegar in the wounds, but Nicola's popularity has definitely suffered some serious blows in the last two or three weeks, as the trends of her assessment by Scottish voters show.

Nicola rose to world-beating levels of approval roughly when the Covid crisis became an everyday reality and the First Great Lockdown started. She then enjoyed the same kind of Pandemic Honeymoon as Boris Johnson, with both peaking at a net positive of 44%, GB-wide for him and in Scotland for her. But all good things must end someday, and it has happened to Nicola while Boris saw a slight improvement in England recently. Boris's rating dropped sharply, as did the Conservatives' voting intentions, after Dominic Cummings's Trip To Durham, and his inconsistencies in dealing with the pandemic hurt him for many months until the vaccine rollout saved his ass. Nicola did not face the same challenges as the only remotely comparable situation, that involving Catherine Calderwood, was dealt with swiftly and decisively, and thusly quickly vanished from the front pages. For a long period Nicola enjoyed a strong net positive with Scottish voters, in the high 30s to mid 40s. It then fell to mid to high 20s after the summer break last year, probably a result of Covid fatigue and not seeing the light at the end of the tunnel to the sunlit uplands. Paradoxically, Nicola often had a higher net positive in the rest of the UK than in Scotland during that period. And the vaccine rollout, which was eventually as successful in Scotland as in England, an even a wee smitch better according to official statistics, did not see here skyrocket to higher levels of approval. Obviously other events had an effect here, from the SNP's infighting to the handling of the Holyrood investigation into the Alex Salmond case. There are also some hints of discontent among SNP voters, even if the overall trend remains spectacularly stellar over most of the last fifteen months.

That last item is probably what Nicola should be fashed about most these days. For an extraordinary length of time, there has been nobody disapproving of Nicola in the party's ranks, just a wee smitch of 'neutral'. And when there was a wee hint of disapproval, it was probably just Kenny MacAskill having a bad day. So we had statistical evidence of what Unionists and disgruntled Yessers called The Cult. But these milk-and-honey days are over for Nicola. Her support among SNP voters dropped by an amazing 19% in the first two March polls, from a net +88% to 'only' +69%. And we're talking about a leader whose net approval rating varied from +65% to +99% over the last fifteen months, so we're definitely at the lower end of the spectrum here. If any English party leader had seen his popularity with his own voters drop in such a way, he would be out on the street in his Union Jack shorts begging for his bus fare home, while the party would be busy anointing the next disposable Chosen One. It can't happen in Scotland, we Scots are more civilised, and did invent The Modern Civilisation As We Know It, did we not? Anyway it's quite obvious Nicola will not be impeached, as the Greens will be available to vote down any motion of no confidence. But she should definitely sit back and reflect about the true reasons why her net positive among SNP voters is now 30% lower than at its peak last year. And she definitely can't expect to make up for this with the Green voters, who are mostly neutral about the way she handles her job, whatever level of support their party is likely to offer in their unmistakeably opportunistic way. Just wait and see what the next approval polls have to say. 

Every time Nicola Sturgeon speaks, it’s amazing

I feel like she’s on the top of a hill with all kilt and no knickers

Just going “you can take the piss, you can grab our pussies”

“But you’ll never take our freedom”

(Aisling Bea, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2016)

© Peter Gabriel, 1992

The weird thing in the Scottish referendum was they went for a "yes or no" vote

Instead of an "aye or git tae fuck, ya schemey bampot prick" vote

(Jimmy Carr, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

So let's see first what has happened on the IndyRef2 front. Remember that, only two weeks ago, we were basking in the glory of 23 successive polls predicting a Yes victory, with just one showing a minuscule No lead. Just let that sink in: TWENTY FUCKING THREE against ONE. I would have taken those odds any day on any issue. Then it all went tits up. Forget the fake poll in The Scotsman, which they readily admitted did not comply with British Polling Council guidelines and thusly was basically crap. But they ran it anyway as it made for cheap click bait fitting the Unionist 'SNP fail' narrative. Shame on them. Unsurprisingly this poll has since been discarded by all serious aggregators. But it's still up there on Wikipedia, with only a minimal footnote warning unsuspecting casual readers that it's just crap. Then we also have had four real polls showing a steep decline in Yes voting intentions, even if the No lead remains within the margin of error in all cases. Bur even this can't hide the basic fact that we reached of peak 58% for Yes not so long ago, and that we're far from this now. And the trendlines of Independence voting intentions definitely look quite depressing.

This month's snapshot, based on the last four polls, definitely paints a doom-and-gloomy picture. Make fun of Ruth Davidson recycling her 2016 jibe that we are 'past peak Nat' all you want, but there's some somber warning in it as the Yes vote definitely went downhill throughout 2017, and certainly more significantly than Baroness Davidson ever anticipated. And you could squarely pin the blame for this on the SNP and the totally unprofessional way in which they conducted the 2017 general election campaign. I remember the Scottish Leaders' Debate ahead of that election and how Ruth Davidson attacked Independence with all guns blazing in the first 20 seconds of her opening statement. And how Nicola Sturgeon did not even mention the word itself until 26 minutes into the debate, while letting herself be cornered into answering questions about reserved matters that were totally irrelevant to a general election. Just to remind everyone that Nicola is not always a brilliant campaigner. Of course you may argue that we now start from a better position than in 2012 just after the Edinburgh Agreement. Surely trailing by 2% is better than trailing by 30%, and we know how the actual campaign cut the No lead by two thirds. But just look back at the Independence polls after the 2017 election, and how the No vote rose to a double digit lead for most of the end of 2017 and all along 2018. We did not see a Yes majority again until August 2019 and it was just a one-off. The tide turned for good only in June 2020 and now it's turned the other way again. So the current snapshot might just be a warning that things can only get worse before they get better.

Don't be naive, or misled by some interpretations of what is going on, or not, within the English Government. Now is the time for them to 'allow' a second Independence referendum. Not because it would be democratically impossible to refuse it, as the mantra goes, but because odds are they would win it. That's what I call their 'Québec strategy'. Then they could tell us "You've just had your second 'once in a generation' opportunity and you fucked it up again. So now it's 'once in a lifetime'. Be seeing you in 2100". They could even play their hand more mischievously, by imposing a three-way question including the Devo Max option, that only a minority of Scots support. But it would snatch a few percentage points off the Yes vote, allowing oven-ready PR about how a majority of Scots favour the Precious Union in one incarnation or the other. Just consider there is something fishy happening out there when even Tory dinosaur Jacob Rees-Mogg floats the idea that the English Government can't oppose IndyRef2 forever.  And even if the next batch of polls are more favourable, we should never underestimate the SNP's proven uncanny ability to totally fuck it up even when dealt the best of hands. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is something we have seen before, haven't we?

One of the things I like about it is they’d have to change the Union Jack

They’d have to get a new flag for England, Wales and Northern Ireland

And I suggest a frog on a motorbike

(Sean Lock, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, 2002

I had a brief nap during Election Night and the man I was staying with woke me up

And he was in tears because Jim Murphy had lost his seat

(Jon Richardson, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2015)

We have also had a poll of Scottish voting intentions for the next general election earlier this month, from the usually reliable YouGov. But I have my doubts about this specific poll because its regional crosstabs show an almost even distribution of votes for all parties across all regions. It totally contradicts not just the findings of all previous polls that publish regional crosstabs, but also the reality of the subnational voting patterns in all elections over the last 10 years. Even when injecting the over and under-performances from YouGov's poll into my model, the result of the projection is still counter-intuitively closer than expected to an uniform swing projection you can get from Electoral Calculus or Election Polling. It actually protects Conservative seats in the North East while leaving their Border seats in the danger zone, quite the opposite of what we usually get. It would even project Labour gaining back Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill because of a rather implausibly high over-performance, 16% above their national average, in Central Scotland. It's quite clear from other polls that Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath or East Lothian would be much likelier Labour gains on a bad day for the SNP, especially as sitting MPs Neale Hanvey and Kenny MacAskill are not part of SNP HQ's Ninth Circle and could face either attempts at deselection from the gendercultist clique, or minimal tepid support from the party's election machine.

There are other counter-intuitive results when using YouGov's regional crosstabs here. The Conservatives would be within shouting distance of gaining back Gordon, and Labour would have decent odds in two more Central seats: Airdrie and Shotts, Motherwell and Wishaw. Which does sound implausible, but that is what the numbers say. And numbers never lie, or do they? Now some of my readers might still think Westminster polls are irrelevant because Scotland will be independent by the time of the next general election. Provided first there is no snap election, and I wouldn't wager even a fiver on that. Then just remember the 2014 timetable: actual independence only 18 months after a successful referendum, meaning the next one would have to take place in November 2022 at the latest. And I don't see that actually happening, even if further IndyRef2 polling showing a 'No' lead would be the perfect background for a massive gamble by the English Government. It would also require the Scottish Government strongly pushing for it, which I also consider an unlikely occurrence for a variety of reasons. One of which being that some sitting SNP MPs do enjoy the snug job and salary, and need some more years to accrue a 'decent' pension. Hasta la dolce vita, Baby!

North Korea said that would be good if Scotland go independent

And that they’ll back them, which is worrying, innit?

It’s like Oscar Pistorius telling you to be more impulsive

(Rob Beckett, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, 1977

The divorce analogy is still going on though, cos it is….

It’s the couple who decided to stay together at the last minute and now they hate each other

The next morning: “No, we’re not better together”

And that’s the funny thing that’s going on in Scotland now

Cos there’s lots of Labour voters going over to the SNP

And it kind of feels inevitable that it will happen at some point in time

(Krishnan Guru-Murthy, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

And now on to the pièce de résistance, the Scottish Parliament polls. We've had three of them this month. One each from Panelbase, YouGov and Savanta Comres. Before I dissect them any further, remember we're just under two months away from the election, and the SNP have indulged in a totally reinvented exercise in internal democracy. Which was clearly one step beyond the Leninist democratic centralism we have come to know and love under Nicola Sturgeon. This time was more like elections in China: vote till you boak but your betters have already chosen the winner, as a comparison between the real results of the list selections and the official lists of candidates show. Not sure this will help the "Both Votes SNP" message getting through, quite sure of the opposite effect actually. Back to our recent polls, Panelbase still don't offer regional crosstabs, which means you start with votes for all parties evenly spread across all regions. And YouGov's crosstabs are, just like their Commons poll, suspiciously close to an even distribution too. So even my reworked algorithms (more on this below in the closing section) deliver something quite close to an uniform swing projection in both cases. Then the Savanta Comres poll shows under and over-performances that look exaggerated in some cases, but that's what the correction mechanisms in my algorithms are here for (again, more on that later). Below is what my model makes of these three polls individually. Just notice that the YouGov poll is clearly off the trend shown by the other two, and even its headline voting intentions might be something of an outlier.

Now you can be delusional, or bask in wishful thinking, whichever you like best, and even some SNP MPs are not immune to that. All you have to do is make a fuss about the YouGov poll and say "Look at this one and how good it is", and totally pretend the other two polls just don't exist. Or you can do a reality check and realise all the reasons why the YouGov poll, just like its Westminster polling companion, walks and quacks like a flawed outlier. There's another option, just for Unionists, that is to loudly claim the Savanta Comres Scottish Tracker is the only one that matters because it's the most recent one. But we all know that, if there's a truth out there, which you are welcome to disagree with, it must be somewhere in between these confusing results. So just have a look at what the weighted average of the three polls says about voting intentions, and what my model makes of that. Which is again quite close to uniform swing as larger samples tend to iron out the outliers, and even more so when two thirds of your source material is already quite close to uniform swing. You might want to think it's not that bad as we still have a majority of seats for the SNP. Only the very last poll does not, and the weighted average is three seats down on the "Peak SNP" we had in mid-February. It's even six seats down if you consider the uniform swing projections instead. So nothing to write home about, and we can all hope this will be a wake-up alarm bell for SNP HQ, and they won't put it on snooze. They will soon be able at last to campaign full time when Holyrood goes into recess, and focus on the election instead of indulging in unnecessary distractions. Fingers crossed, then. 

Notice we have two polls now predicting one or two independent MSP, even if the weighted average erases them. The most likely one might be Andy Wightman in Highlands and Islands, and the runner-up Martin Keatings in Mid-Scotland and Fife. Or not, as the alt-Yes vote will probably be split between several lists who will bag an impressive 117 votes each. Alt-Yessers have inherited these so appallingly Scottish traits of being both tribal and feral, which is one sure recipe to achieve fuck all. If they just sat back and took a deep breath, they would realise the obvious: their only chance at bagging a couple of seats is to unite all under one banner and stand as joint lists in every region. Thusly they would have a remote chance at propelling both Andy Wightman and Martin Keatings to Holyrood and be a thorn in the SNP's arse for the next five years. But unfortunately for them, many of this lot have been potty-trained in politics as SNP or Labour members, and all they remember from these days is how to fuck up a golden opportunity. Something in which both parties have proven expertise. Then it is not outwith the realm of plausibility that enough potential SNP voters will find the alt-Yessers better value for votes than the Greens and allow them to sneak in through the back door. Stranger things have happened, and at least Martin Keatings deserves it, in acknowledgment of the excellent work he has done with the People's Action On Section 30. Then maybe Andy Wightman does not really deserve another term after all, for having been the SNP's useful idiot during Holyrood's Salmond inquiry. Just saying.

Better Together is a terrible slogan for the break-up of a marriage, innit?

It’s like sleeping in separate beds but you’re just doing it for the kids

(Rob Beckett, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, 2002

It was like 300 years we’ve sort of been together with Scotland

And that’s going to be a big breakup, innit?

Imagine, like, sorting the DVDs out

I’ve only been married two weeks and the DVD situation is well out of hand

(Rob Beckett, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

Now bear with me for a wee while as I update you on the fine tuning of my model. I told you last time I had revamped it to inject the over and under-performances shown by the regional crosstabs. Then I had a bad feeling about the results and sought a second opinion. Mine, actually. Until that lightbulb moment when I realised injecting the raw overs and unders from current polls was a double whammy as you already have overs and unders in the 2016 results, and that was like counting them twice. And the right approach was not to inject the current overs and unders in the model, but just the difference between today's overs and unders and those that were already there in 2016. Let's say current polling shows the SNP overperforming by 4% and Labour by 6% in Glasgow, and you think it's fine. But both overperformed there by 6% in 2016, so it's actually a wee swing from the SNP to Labour. Which does not matter in Glasgow as the SNP are so far ahead in all constituencies that it would take much more than this for Labour to gain back any. The flaw in the original reengineering was more visible in the South. Let's say today's poll says the SNP are underperforming by 7% and the Conservatives overperforming by 12% Doon In Doon. And that spells doom as it would swing a couple of seats to the Tories. But the SNP already underperformed by 6% and the Conservatives overperformed by 11% there in 2016. So today's poll is more like "no real change" and says no seats would change hands. So I altered all the formulas to inject only the differences between today's overs and unders and 2016's, instead of the raw values, and replayed all the polls conducted in 2021 accordingly, so here's what we get now.

The results are less shockingly bad for the SNP than they were, or could have been, in the early not-too-well-ironed version. But they remain slightly less favourable than what you get from a projection on uniform national swing. Which you can do yourself using the Scottish Parliament Swingometer page on the Electoral Polling site. Or you can rely on Ballot Box Scotland, who have their own methodology, which is neither mine nor full reliance on uniform national swing. Just bear in mind the values may differ but the trends won't, as everybody relies on the exact same pool of polls. My approach may amplify the warning signs from unfavourable polls, but that doesn't mean the warning signs aren't there. Just as being paranoid does not mean there's nobody out there to get you. So there's little comfort to be gained from the uniform swing projections, as they too reflect the recent decline in the SNP's voting intentions. And any method would also reflect the impact of better polls, which we all can only hope will happen as SNP HQ up their game, preferably in time for the election to not be a massive setback.

Whatever colour your glasses are, you can't escape the conclusion that something is going fucking wrong here. Especially if you agree with my diagnosis that the last YouGov poll walks and quacks like an outlier, so that the Panelbase and Savanta Comres polls might definitely be closer to the harsh truth. So 'tis is the time of the year when we reach that point where the Twittersphere goes Mount Etna with finger-pointing. I won't play the blame game here or plead both-sidesism, that's not what I do. Let's just say that one of the sides in the SNP bar brawl had much more leverage on shaping the narrative and public opinion's reactions, and totally fucked it up. Not naming names, but you know who you are. And if you don't, you're dafter than I thought. Let's just hope it won't end up with us proving that the chindi have taken over, and we really deserve to be colonised by wankers and ruled by effete arseholes. The saddest part here is that the election might be decided in the very last couple of days by something of a coin toss. Will enough people just say "fuck it, I've had enough of the SNP's dunderwhelps fucking it up as they go" to make 2017 look like a good year in comparison? Or will Douglas Ross prove enough of a jobbernowl to rally the Yesser troops around the Saltire and propel the SNP past the magic 65? Your guess is as good as mine.

The biggest missed opportunity was for England

Because there was a point during the campaigning

When Cameron, Clegg, Farage and Miliband were all in Scotland

Which was our opportunity for a snap election on independence

Put an armed guard up at the border and keep the pricks up there for a while

You can have them now, you deal with them for a bit

(Jon Richardson, 8 Out Of 10 Cats, 2014)

© Peter Gabriel, 1986

House Of Confusion

We’re a nation that’s gone so far up its own arse it can’t move from the crap everywhere

(Peter Boyd, Waking The Dead: Anger Management, 2004)

© Tony Banks, Phil Collins, Michael Rutherford, 1986

You can’t understand the picture if you’re inside the frame

(Peter Boyd, Waking The Dead: Final Cut, 2003)

There is an interesting paradox in current voting trends, and one that is quite counter-intuitive even for me. It might well prove easier for Labour to form a government in a hung Parliament than for the Conservatives. Bear in mind that, whatever the exact voting intentions and with Sinn Féin excluded for the usual reason, there will always be a bloc of 80-85 MPs who would be neither Labour nor Conservatives, and could exert massive influence on the post-election events. Of these only the DUP could be expected to support a Tory government, or perhaps not. So the likely scenario is that the Conservatives would indeed need an outright majority, or else they might face a Coalition Of The Unwilling ready to vote down each and every bill. While Labour could count on support from the SDLP and some sort of agreement with Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the LibDems and the Alliance Party, who have de facto become the local branch of the LibDems in Northern Ireland. Meaning Labour could count on an additional 15-20 votes and form a viable minority government with as few as 280-290 MPs of their own, as in this case the Conservatives would be down to 275-285. Of course, all these scenarios can happen only if Labour and the Conservatives are really close in the popular vote, somewhere between a tie and Labour leading by a couple of points. Which has happened at the end of last year in many polls, so let's just see first what the trends look like now, two months into the Year Of The Snoek, shall we?

What the 2021 polls tell us is that we're back to the situation we had in midsummer, which is definitely more of a trogglehumper than a night's dream for Labour. Personal image matters too and people seem to have forgotten what a flushbunking blatherskite Boris has been over the last twelve months. Next thing you know, we're gonna have a statue of Saint Boris Slaying The Virus in the middle of Parliament Square. Just the kind of narrative that definitely works in Leafy Eastern Surrey, though admittedly less so in the Red-To-Blue-To-Red Wall counties. But even there, you can see signs that lingering doubt has given way to benefit of the doubt. Interestingly The Guardian, never short on contradictions, now advise Labour to devote more efforts to South England, pretty much repeating my earlier arguments that New New Labour will win the next election if they crawl back to the same level of support New Labour enjoyed in the Home Counties, even at their low point in 2005. Which is definitely not what the last batch of polls predict, as Labour is left bopmuggered by the number of voters who have whiffswiddled back to the Tories since the world-beating Snoek Deal, and even more so since the First Minister of England is rollicking in his deepfreeze-ready Pfizer Honeymoon. And that's the moment Keir Starmer chooses to go natterboxing rommytot about how giganticus weapons of mass destruction are, which will probably not really help either in Hampstead or Glasgow. If he was really paying attention, Sly Keir should feel scrotty over where public opinion stands now, based on the weighted average of the last four published polls, conducted between 19 and 26 February. Super-sample size is 6,307 with a highly theoretical 1.23% margin of error.

Before we proceed any further, there's a necessary and long-overdue caveat, about the SNP's vote share in GB-wide or UK-wide polls. Which is, believe it or not, overestimated, or rather represented above its actual level because of the pollsters' weighting mechanisms. According to ONS data, Scotland accounts for 8.2% of the UK's population, or 8.4% of Great Britain's. But higher voter registration means Scotland accounts for 8.5% of the UK's electorate, or 8.7% of Great Britain's. Then higher turnout at the 2019 election meant that Scotland accounted for 8.6% of all votes cast in the UK, or 8.8% of all those cast in Great Britain. And now our problems start. Based on the four main pollsters' published data for their most recent survey, here is the share of Scotland in their original sample, and then after excluding undecideds and weighting by likelihood to vote. I included only each's last poll here, but you can trust me it's all the same in past polls, and sometimes even worse, depending on the relative weight of undecideds that are scratched from the final 'headline result'.

YouGov publish only one set of numbers, which I assume represent the original makeup of their sample, without any hint on how weighting might alter that. So the makeup of the original samples is something of a mixed bag, but more or less accurate or inaccurate depending on your mood. But the post-weighting share of Scotland is definitely and conclusively overestimated by three of our main pollsters, and quite possibly also by the fourth one even if we don't have the smoking gun here. Which is why you see the SNP vote skyrocket from 3.98% in 2019 to fantastically implausible levels like 5-6%, while low-to-mid 50ish% of Scottish vote is more like 4.2-4.4% of the GB-wide vote. And this also gets you biffsquiggled and wondering why the SNP don't systematically bag all 59 fucking seats when their vote share is so razztwizzlery high. Fortunately, real Scotland-only polls are here to remind us that the SNP really do better than in 2019, though it might not always be such a landslide as you might think at first glance. For example, this week's full Scottish poll from Survation has the SNP on 48% of Commons voting intentions, which would be something like 4.1% GB-wide, and yet my current Poll'O'Polls says 4.2%, which would be some 51% of the Scottish vote. Just saying, so that you don't get your hopes too wildly high, especially when the trend sees the SNP slowly losing votes.

If you want the high life, you have to embrace some serious lowlife

(Claudia Baxter, Silent Witness: River's Edge, 2016) 

© Tony Banks, Phil Collins, Steve Hackett, Michael Rutherford, 1976

It strikes me that the human race is supposed to be more evolved

If you look at all this, you've gotta ask yourself if, as a species, we are on the right track

(Peter Boyd, Waking The Dead: The Hardest Word, 2004)

What polls tell us now is that the Conservative lead over Labour would be cut by almost half compared to 2019 and back to a 2015ish level. My model says it would take Boris just a few seats shy of a majority, but far from what is needed to pull a bonking stonker this time. Such an outcome would definitely not mean that Britain's Got Less Talent, as most of the fatalities here would be pibbling notmuchers from the 2019 intake, whose main contribution to the political debate has been the perfect triangulation of arse-licking incompetence. The only really noticeable Tory fatality here would be Graham Brady, Chair of the 1922 Committee of unruly backbenchers and a born-again Covidiot trying to outfox Nigel Farage on his turf. As it stands, Conservatives would gain only four seats: Alyn and Deeside, Dagenham and Rainham, Canterbury from Labour; Westmoreland and Lonsdale from the LibDems. The latter if they find a candidate who can outbigot Tim Farron on Christian values and homophobia, which shouldn't be too difficult when you think of it. Of course there are also even odds on Tories snatching Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock from the SNP. Just don't tell Douglas Ross and Andrew Bowie as they would drool at the prospect of a three-seat gain.

Odds are Bozo could even bribe the DUP back into some shade of supportivish neutrality, if he has enough pocket change left after spaffing so much on contracts awarded unlawfully to cronies and the publican next door. All it would take is reneging on the world-beating Christmas Gift To Britain Deal, which wouldn't matter anyway as nobody remembers what was in it, and most Ministers never even knew. Or he could try and convince Arlene Foster that duplicating the Swindon Roundabout under the Isle of Man is not such a plexicated idea as it looks, and could even be quite a ringbeller as long as it totally squishes Irish Reunification by not having any subaquatic connection to Dublin. The alternate scenarios, once I reallocate the marginals to the runner-up, are again quite interesting. The Conservatives' best case scenario would still see them lose two dozen seats, which proves that duplicating the 2019 upset is not that easy, even with some help from Astra-Zeneca. Labour's best case scenario would again trigger lots of speculation in the few days before Not-So-Hardy Keir decides not to extend an olive branch to the SNP after all. This is far from the 'get the popcorn out' scenario I mentioned earlier, where Keir could gamble a minority government without the Pesky Jocks. On these numbers, Keir would have to show his baws, and listen to Clive Lewis instead of Ian Murray and Anas Sarwar. But of course we already know Keir will never go that far, don't we? Better to never be First Minister of England that to make any concession to the Nats. Aye, right.

For your complete information, I have now re-engineered all my models, not just the Scottish one, to accommodate regional crosstabs when the pollsters provide them. When we have them, they're based on the Senedd and Holyrood electoral regions in Wales and Scotland. London is split between Outer and Inner, which has some taste of Middlesex vs Labourgravia, by Redfield and Wilton, who happen to be the only ones conducting London-specific polls since the 2019 election. Redfield and Wilton also crosstab their polling data from the rest of England with the eight ONS regions, while other pollsters stick to the cruder North-Midlands-South divide. I won't claim this is perfect and faultless, but is does look like an interesting approach to different changes in voting patterns all over the UK since the last election. As I mentioned earlier, factoring in the regional crosstabs helps the Conservatives against the SNP in Scotland, which could help SNP HQ realise that not all landslides do happen. It's fairly neutral in Wales, though in can help Plaid Cymru in some cases. In London, the Middlesex Effect helps the Conservatives against Labour. There's a strong opposite pattern in the rest of England, with the Conservatives only getting entrenched deeper in the Leafy South, while Labour come back with a meaner vengeance in the North and part of the Midlands. You can see below how my tweaked model compares with the untweaked version, and also with what my competitors predict with the same current set of voting intentions data.

What we have this time is the unlikely and seldom seen alignment of the polls, when all projections more or less based on uniform swing deliver a very similar number of seats, give or take la handful. I know from several other simulations that it is way more likely that my three competitors will deliver results quite different from mine, and then the regional tweaks make the gap even bigger, sometimes up to 25ish seats mostly switching from the Conservatives to Labour. The differences in algorithms and underlying data might not make a massive difference with some aggregates of polls, but it is not always true when relying on individual polls. As I said earlier about my Scottish seat projections, larger samples tend to level out the outliers. All you need is one outlier in one direction and another one going the opposite way, and it all folds back neatly into regression to the mean. On top of that I still need to assess more precisely whether the differences in the algorithms (using a mix of proportional swing and uniform swing instead of just uniform swing) matter more that the tweaks to the underlying data. Might make for some interesting case studies with various combinations of polls, though I have a hunch this might be conclusive only if we have a murder of polls going in the same direction, rather that the often contradictory results we have had so often in the past.  

If you're a lion with a degree of moral sensitivity, then you just stopped being a lion

(Doctor Greta Simpson, Waking The Dead: The Hardest Word, 2004)

© Steve Hackett, Phil Collins, 1977

Enjoy Gary O'Toole doing something Phil Collins never ever did

Singing and drumming at the same time, which is quite a feat

So, making mistakes can make you popular? Who knew?

(Clarissa Mullery, Silent Witness: Betrayal, 2019)

Polls don't only show better electoral prospects for the Conservatives as a whole. Boris Johnson's personal ratings have also improved over the last two months, as well as his standing in Preferred Prime Minister polling. It's like people are sending the message that they don't mind eating snoek and no longer buying books from France for the next three years, as long as they all get their jags and then can go to the game and sling tins at the linesman again. Which might be uncomfortably closer to the truth than you might want to believe, for Englanders at least. According to the aggregate of all polls, the First Minister of England's net approval rating has improved from -11% in November, -8% in December when we had some of the first hints of 'Fucking Brexit Getting Fucking Done', -7% in January after the not-so-convincing Bozo Deal with the EU, -1% in February after twelve weeks of vaccine rollout. Boris Johnson has also skyrocketed back to a convincing lead over Keir Starmer in the Preferred Prime Minister polls, which definitely look bad for Sly Keir. There's a double whammy in there, with both a number of Starmeristas switching to undecided, and a number of undecideds rallying around Boris. I won't even lecture you on the importance of cuddling undecideds, in England just as in Scotland, as I have made that point repeatedly already, haven't I?

The next question is whether there will be a Very Tory Coup against Boris Johnson, something along the lines of November 1990 déjà vu all over again. Though you have to understand most Tory MPs would think twice before becoming part of that. They all know that Boris is an evil ruthless vindictive bastard. If you staged a coup against him, you'd have to win or be relegated to the Ninth Circle, so standing orders would have to be "shoot to kill and take no prisoners". A number of Tory MPs from the 2019 intake never thought they would be elected, even in their wettest dreams. They think they owe it to Bozo, so they're ready to be his cannon fodder, and wouldn't even try and explain their support by anything more intellectual than "because it's Boris". Never mind this lot are mostly complete shitwanks like Ben Bradley, and pretty much the Trashcan Men to Johnson's Randall Flagg. Numbers matter here, not brains, and these and other Boris Cultists probably make up about a third of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. Then another third have already challenged Boris from the right, broadly on the basis of libertarian and traditional English values, including painting the closing of the pubs as an unacceptable breach of civil liberties. This lot, hardly more intellectual than the first one, would probably have supported Michael Gove before he got his wings and claws clipped, though they probably dispunge Sleekit in private, but now they know better than to fuck with Boris. And finally, the last third are more like traditional One-Nationers still believing that conservatism has a compassionate side, but are also business-friendly. Since their natural leader, who would be Theresa May, has pretty much burnt herself out already, they would be the logical fanbase for PR-savvy Rishi Sunak. Though a divided Tory party might have some more surprises in store, including the unlikely return of Jeremy-In-The-Box Hunt. Or the much more likely scenario where the Covidiots dump the burnt-out vermicious Gove and switch allegiance to Rishi "Let's Open Everything Wide" Sunak, which would be one fucking fuck of a problem for Boris.

Now there is also a lot of ambiguity and contradictions in Rishi's levels of approval in recent polls. The most recent favourability survey by YouGov has him on a +13% net rating, which makes him the only Cabinet member with a net positive and a shitload of leagues ahead of the others: Priti Patel on -37%, Dominic Raab on -19%, Matt Hancock on -23% and even Boris himself on -12%. But YouGov is definitely the least Boris-friendly of all pollsters, so don't read too much into that one poll. Rishi is also doing a lot better here than Keir Starmer, who is on a net -10%. Oddly this 23-point lead does not translate into a massive advantage in Prime Minister polling, though there are multiple caveats here. You can't compare these directly with the Johnson-Starmer chart above as only one pollster, Redfield and Wilton, has tested the Sunak-Starmer option. While six pollsters test the Johnson-Starmer option regularly with somewhat different results, so the signal from Redfield tends to be lost in all the noise. Redfield and Wilton are also the most consistently Johnson-friendly in this niche polling, so I wouldn't rule out Starmer actually doing better than Sunak if any other pollster asked the same question, which would indeed be quite counter-intuitive if you take the favourability ratings at face value. But then Rishi hasn't had the same wealth of opportunities as Boris to outfox Keir in Commons, has he? Perhaps Lindsay Hoyle should now make Chancellor's Questions a regular feature, like every other week instead of the highly predictable and borderline boring PMQs, and we would see what happens.

You probably remember I said two months ago that Boris wouldn't last till the end of this year. Which was based on polls predicting a hung Parliament where Labour would be tied with the Conservatives on the number of seats, and might even end up as the first party. Now the last batch of polls says we are very far from that, because hopscotchy Boris is basking in the spotlights of a world-beating Covid vaccination scheme, and people have pretty much immunised themselves against all his poppyrot. So Oor Feisty Bozo has got himself a stay of execution, and he'd better make the most of it while it lasts, like awarding the next English school meals contract to Wetherspoons while everyone is watching the squirrels who survived Jo Swinson. Then the litmus test might come sooner that Boris wants or expects, when he has to take a principled stand and say something intelligible in the incoming debate about 'Covid passports', and I definitely can't think of any answer that wouldn't leave him crodsquinkled and at odds with one half of his own party or the other. Then Boris might try and make the point moot by sending Matt Hancock on a fact-finding mission about Gwyneth Paltrow's vagina-scented cure for Long Covid. Not available in Northern Ireland. Terms and conditions apply. Or he might take a leaf from Theresa May's playbook and kick that can of worms down the road, until the vaccine rollout is completed and public opinion agrees that segregation is the right thing to do. Which might not be as far-fetched as we would like to think. Never underestimate the genetically-inherited propensity of Englanders for discrimination and erecting barriers where none exist. Sunlit uplands are great as long as you don't let everybody in, aren't they?

These our actors, as I foretold you, were all spirits and are melted into air, into thin air.

And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, the cloud-capp’d towers, the gorgeous palaces,

The solemn temples, the great globe itself, yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,

And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, leave not a rack behind. 

We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep.

(Prospero, The Tempest, Act IV, Scene I)

© Tony Banks, Phil Collins, Peter Gabriel, Steve Hackett, Michael Rutherford, 1974

The Year Of The Nats

It was the year of fire

The year of destruction

The year we took back what was ours

It was the year of rebirth

The year of great sadness

The year of pain

And a year of joy

It was a new age

It was the end of history

It was the year everything changed

The year is 2021

The place... Scotland

(Babylon 5, Season Four opening sequence, almost....)

© Al Stewart, Peter Wood, 1976

Keep your mind open too wide and your brains will fall out

(Detective Superintendent Colin Osbourne, Silent Witness: Beyond Guilty, 2003)

I have a feeling '21 is gonna be a good year. For Scotland if not for England. Because I can't honestly give a rat's fuck about what will happen to or in England. They wanted Brexit and the First Minister of England they elected got it done. More or less. Now it's their mess and they have to own it and sort it out. And don't even try that "we're all in it together" cooshite, because we're not. You have painted yourselves into a corner without exit, but we have the motive, means and opportunity to get ourselves out of this. So keep calm and eat your Brexit snoek, and let us go our own way. Just wait and see. Scottish Independence is the next logical step after the First Minister of England surrendered Northern Ireland to the Republic of Ireland and Gibraltar to Spain, isn't it? And you all should be so happy to see those pesky thrifty Jocks go, who can't even manage themselves and you subsidise to the tune of £15bn a year. Oor Doogie Ross, Baroness Ruth Davidson and Nigel Farage said it, so it has to be true. It's £289mil a week, so I guess all we have to do is paint that on the side of a bus and tour it from Carlisle to Truro, and you will instantly vote us out of your Precious Union, so you can take back control of all that dosh. But don't come whining and blaming us when you realise there is no dosh at all, and it was all a lie that you were just too happy to believe. 

© Rebecca Hendin, The Guardian, 2020

2020 was the Year Of The Nyaffs in so many ways that anything 2021 becomes can only be an improvement. Then I would be at a loss choosing the Nyaff Of The Year, as they are so many who deserve it. Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg would definitely deserve a Lifetime Achievement Award, which clears the field for other worthy contenders. Of course Dominic Cummings would get an award, you'd just have to pick for which of his many feats over last year, and getting himself sacked for being too much of a nyaff, even by Johnsonian standards, doesn't count. I guess we could also have an Ensemble Cast Award for Priti Patel, Matt Hancock, Robert Jenrick, Dominic Raab, Gavin Williamson and Oliver Dowden as The Worst Cabinet in Living Memory. North Of The Wall, I definitely nominate Oor Doogie Ross for his successive U-turns on the Internal Market Bill, which had him ending up exactly where he started from. Kirsty Blackman for her asinine whining over Woko Haram taking one fuck of a shellacking at the SNP's NEC election. Wee Andy Bowie for his attempt to spin the Bozo Deal as a great success and England's Christmas present to Scottish fishermen. Rev Stu Campbell, though technically he's way Doon Sooth, for relaying the Tory lie that 'voting against the deal is voting for no deal' in another attempt to smear and undermine the SNP . And finally another Ensemble Cast Award for all the Genderist Cultists who left the SNP and joined the Scottish Greens, after the SNP were forced by their own rebels to let Scottish Parliament pass Johann Lamont's 'sex not gender' amendment to the Forensic Medical Services Bill. Then of course that was last year, and since then we've seen some new outpour of madness. More on that later when discussing this year's polls.

Now Scottish politicians of all shades are getting ready for this year's election, and there is no doubt the Brexit fallout will play a huge part in the campaign. It would indeed be a dereliction of duty if the SNP did not use it to massively make the case for Independence. Because, no matter what SNP HQ have in mind, the Scottish Parliament election has to be, and will be for millions of voters, a 'pseudo-referendum' on Independence. I don't think the SNP desperately trying to shoot themselves in both feet and both hands simultaneously will have much impact here. I am quite sure voters have their priorities straighter than the governing party, and that support for Independence will continue to be the default option for the foreseeable future. Of course The Cause will benefit greatly from Labour rebranding themselves as the party of English Nationalism, a move that even the Starmer-friendly Guardian thinks is a massive blunder that could derail Sly Keir's attempts to make his party attractive again, and is fought by the true progressives within Labour. Sly Keir has also come up with what he probably thinks is the Magic Wand against Independence: Radical Federalism, or Double Devo Max, or The Vow 2.0. Of course you are welcome to unbelieve everything that Labour, or a think tank close to Labour, has ever said about it being a viable alternative. Because it's not, but could be a massive Squirrel In The Room, the distraction Unionists need to keep our eyes off the proverbial ball. Only Panelbase have tested a three-way vote so far, in their latest survey for The Sunday Times. They found that only 20% of Scots support this Third Way being on the ballot, and just 17% would actually vote for it. But it would snatch 5% off Yes and 12% off No, so Yes would not get an outright majority. You can bet the English Establishment would use that as evidence the referendum was inconclusive and we don't get Independence after all. So let's stick to the classic Yes-Or-No question, and here's what the updated trends of voting intentions say, once undecideds are counted out.

I think that the situation is not as bad as the recent downward trend of the Yes vote would make you believe. First of all, you should not consider just the raw results, bot also how they compare with previous answers to the same question. Here the Survation and SavantaComres polls show no change from the previous surveys by the same firms, that were both fielded in December. Only the Panelbase poll is a bit worrying as it shows the Yes lead down by 6% on their previous poll conducted in November. But this earlier poll was one of those showing an unexpectedly high level of support for Yes, so part of the explanation might just be random differences in sampling. Or not. Then the reassuring part is that the weighted average of the three January polls is not significantly different from what we had the last time I wrote about this in November, as the chart further down shows. Just notice that undecideds still make up about 10% of the electorate, and potentially still hold the key to success. As I have said multiple times already, the path to victory is converting undecideds, and I'm delighted to see The National has now endorsed this strategy and launched a new campaign that looks quite successful so far. Let's just hope this will not fall flat after the SNP announced their Eleven Points Roadmap, that quite muddied the waters by being released after hearings were concluded in Martin Keatings's People's Action On Section 30, which has now been sent to the Inner House of the Court of Session. It was quite puzzling to see Pete Wishart claiming the first ruling was a final blow for the case, when it obviously was not, as it was not dismissed on its merits but pretty much on technicalities. But Pipe'n'Slippers Pete had probably not read the SNP's document in full, as its Article 10 clearly states that court action to circumvent Section 30 will be on the table after Holyrood passes a Referendum Bill. Always fun to see Wishy making an arse of himself trying to out-sturgeon Sturgeon on gradualism. But then who still really cares about what Pete has to say?

There's a widespread theory in social sciences that human primates are naturally resistant to change, even when they affirm they support it, because they are unsure what the consequences will be. In many cases too, a lot of people who want change to happen don't expect it to happen, because they don't believe there will be a majority for it, even when polls say otherwise. So there is a double element of doubt, which seems to be currently absent from the Scottish collective mind. First factor is certainly that Independence has been the center of the political debate for more than eight years now, since the Edinburgh Agreement paved the way for the first referendum. All the pros and cons, even the wildly hypothetical, have been debated at some point from all possible perspectives, so people certainly think they have all they need to know to make an educated choice. In this context, I definitively think that any reincarnation of Project Fear will fail, because the people know better and the lies have already been debunked time and again, and all the phony reports in the world won't make a fucking difference. There is conclusive evidence in recent polls than more people want IndyRef2 to happen within the next five years than would vote Yes, and also that more expect Yes to win than would vote Yes or want the referendum to happen. Which is quite far from the double whammy of doubt you could expect when faced with the prospect of such radical change. And if you think Independence is screwed by the SNP reopening the Pandora's can of worms of identity politics, and prioritising pandering to an obstreperous extremist fringe over the proverbial top prize, bear in mind that all that was left at the bottom of the box was Hope, or so the saying goes. Not that Hope, of course. 

Our relationship is based on mutual loathing but it’s a living thing

It needs nurturing, it has to be sustained by continual conflict and abuse

(Charlie Gimbert, Lovejoy: The Sting, 1986)

© Al Stewart, 1976

Instead of scuppering the Scottish nationalists, a Scottish Parliament has made them more popular

Now, that might only be a blip but, with her own politics, her own news,

Today’s Scotland feels a lot more than 400 miles away from Westminster

No constitutional chopper has come down between Scotland and England

But it feels as if a slow, gentle separation is taking place

Like two pieces of pizza pulled apart, still connected, but only by strings of molten cheese

(Andrew Marr, History Of Modern Britain, broadcast on BBC on 19 June 2007)

Of course everyone expects the pandemic to have an impact on our May election. Which is why the Scottish Government tabled the Scottish General Election (Coronavirus) Bill, that the Scottish Parliament passed unanimously on 23 December. This was Stage 3 of the process, so the Bill is now law. It postpones dissolution to 5 May, the day before the election, so that any contingency plans can be debated and voted on until the last moment. It also increases the Presiding Officer's power to postpone the election, from one month to six months. Holding the election over several days has been ruled out, unless the Electoral Management Board propose it at a later date, which right now looks unlikely. Finally the most important, and possibly most controversial part, addresses postal voting. Tory MSP Oliver Mundell has recently been warned by the Electoral Commission over 'postal vote fishing', that is asking constituents to send their application to his constituency office instead of the Electoral Registration Officer. There is also circumstantial evidence that Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie did the same, which sounds definitely fishy. The Bill now brings the deadline to apply for a postal vote forward to 6 April. This is considered necessary to deal with an increased workload for election officers, as postal votes are expected to rise from 18% in 2016 to 40-50% this year. But the Scottish Government also made it clear they are not encouraging postal vote, as every precaution will be taken to make in-person voting safe. Let's just hope it will work and we won't have any nasty surprises in the next three months. The Bill nevertheless includes provisions for an all-postal vote, clearly as a last resort measure that would involve postponing the election by a yet unspecified delay. We have pretty much all bases covered and all parties in agreement, so let's roll.

This bill not only provides a base plan to hold the election as scheduled, it also provides a backup to the base plan, a backup to the backup and a last resort scenario. Scotland is more prepared to hold a safe election than any other country worldwide, and Unionists who say otherwise now are only talking through their arse in shameless bad faith, because poll after poll points to a 2011ish SNP landslide. Just remind them that Portugal held a presidential election in January, and the Netherlands will hold a parliamentary election in March, and nobody in either country claimed it would be unsafe and asked for a postponement. The Welsh government too has never raised the possibility of postponing the Senedd election, due to be held the same day as the Holyrood election. What might, or might not, happen with the English local elections is also totally irrelevant here. Some have suggested they should be postponed, but stress the rationale is a world-beating state of unpreparedness and the total lack of contingency plans, which means everything Doon Sooth will be left to last minute improvisation, with councils receiving fuck all support or advice from the English government. The polar opposite of the Scottish situation, and now the point is moot anyway after England and Wales decided to hold their locals no matter what. Anyway we've had three Holyrood polls in January, from SavantaComres, Survation and Panelbase. Oddly they basically agree on the constituency vote, but show different results for the list vote that are beyond the margin of error or a plausible sampling variation. Just below is the weighted average of voting intentions and how my model translates that into seats. We again have an outright majority for the SNP, which they would 'as usual' bag on the constituencies alone, and a sizeable pro-Independence majority. Though we have drifted now from earlier "much better than 2011" results to "just as good as 2011" for the SNP. More reasons to not be complacent and avoid obvious own goals, though it might be too late for the latter advice. We will have a better assessment of the shockwaves from recent SNP bar brawls soon enough, probably with the next Scottish Political Tracker from SavantaComres, which is quite probably being conducted right now. 

For the first time, I am using here a re-engineered version of my model, which relies now on the regional crosstabs for both the constituency vote and the list vote, when pollsters publish them. This is the case here for SavantaComres and Survation, so only the Panelbase poll injects a minority component of uniform swing. The regional crosstabs say the the SNP would do better than their national average in Central Scotland, Glasgow, Highlands and Islands, but significantly worse in South Scotland. Labour would do better just in Glasgow and West Scotland, the Liberal Democrats in Highlands and Islands, the Conservatives in North East and South, the Greens in Glasgow and Lothian. But the odd workings of AMS mean the projection based on regional crosstabs would have a significant impact in one region only: South Scotland. Here my revamped model says the SNP would fail to gain any of the four Conservative constituencies, but would swap that for two list seats. The SNP would lose one list seat because they are projected to gain East Lothian from Labour, which AMS would automatically compensate. Which would create a tricky situation for the SNP as their three MSPs from the South were all elected on the list in 2016. The last shenanigans of the SNP's NEC mean this would most probably cost Joan McAlpine her seat, definitely bad news for those who advocate a return to sanity within the SNP. Then the Conservatives would find themselves in quite a conundrum in Highlands and Islands, where they would bag only two list seats. Since one is already reserved for the return of Oor Doogie Ross to Holyrood, two of their incumbents would have to be kicked out, probably by a coin toss. The comparison of my results with those from two other sources, that both rely on uniform swing, shows that the different algorithms make little difference in the end. Different predicted outcomes in the constituencies are erased by the leveling effect of the allocation of lists seats. And if one party misses a list seat in a region where they underperform, it is likely to be compensated in another region where they overperform. So the conclusions you can draw from your projections remain the same.

It would definitely be good strategy for the SNP to stress how Scottish Labour, no matter how 'independent' they want to rebrand themselves, are more than ever subservient to the decisions taken in London by Keir Starmer's Ninth Circle. The leader who has made himself sound so bland that even The Guardian find him uninspiring, and hold his chestnuts to the fire for his many inconsistencies. Scottish voters will never buy the crap, reminiscent of the Iraq War era, that the Liberal Democrats can be something of a progressive alternative to a confused Labour. Not when they have the SNP on the ballot, who would benefit mightily from distancing themselves from their social-liberal policies, and embracing again the social-democratic values that made them successful in the past. And that also happened after a fiercely fought civil war, with Alex Salmond first expelled and then coming back with a vengeance and taking over the party, as John Curtice reminds us in The National, though he then rambles on again about the obvious. A strong push against a still possible Labour rebirth has the potential to deliver what the SNP need: a handful of list seats that would prove all the alt-Yes naysayers wrong. if you keep whispering "Vote Labour, Get Tories" in their ears. The freak scenario now would be to see the SNP nose-diving in polls, a clear and present danger former SNP PR lad Kevin Pringle was right to point out in The National. It's quite clear that some at the highest levels of the SNP food chain are genuinely worried about Nicola needlessly re-igniting the internal feuds. Of course there will be a price to pay for the infighting against an imaginary 'enemy within' leaking into the public domain. This is not what SNP voters expect, they want the party to concentrate its broadsides on the real enemy: the Conservatives who have repeatedly betrayed and insulted Scotland over the last five years and beyond. And of course nobody should refrain from the pleasure of exposing Oor Doogie Ross for the abysmal failure he is, even compared to his lacklustre predecessor.

The SNP's NEC once again bending the rules to shoehorn some of Woko Haram's Lost Boys into Holyrood despite their massive earlier defeats, and the unexpected sacking of Joanna Cherry from the Commons' frontbench dominated the news for a couple of cycles. But I suspect there was some Squirrel Effect here again as the most important item, in the long run, didn't make headlines: Humza Yousaf withdrawing the amendments to his Thought Police Bill that would have protected freedom of speech from the Genderist Inquisition, and delegating 'a broader definition of freedom of expression' to two prominent members of that clique, without involving the SNP's women groups or human rights lawyers. The various daily twists and turns of the Holyrood probe into the Alex Salmond case are also good clickbait. So now I guess we will never see Big Eck's Book Of Revelations on the shelves, as the revelations, and then some, are all over the press and social media day after day. So all Alex could do of all that is a scrapbook, and I don't think he will ever need one in the foreseeable future. But all the fracas could lead to Nicola Sturgeon being impeached at some point, which I think can still be delayed until after the election. Which totally explains retrospectively, for those who did not get it when it happened, the plot to keep Joanna Cherry away from Holyrood and install Angus Robertson as the heir apparent. But the best laid plans.... and an unexpected credible contender for Bute House has been mentioned: Kate Forbes, who unexpectedly became the instant target of some genderists. I totally admit the SNP's social-democratic wing would find themselves in quite a paradoxical situation if they ended up supporting Kate as First Minister against Angus, as she is not the most progressive voice about women's rights and gay rights. But we have resolved worst contradictions in the past, haven't we? Bottom line anyway is that I fear that SNP HQ should now abandon all hope of a 'peaceful and orderly transition' within their Ninth Circle and brace themselves for something quite more brutal.

An evil enemy will burn his own nation to the ground, to rule over the ashes

(Sun Tzu)

© Al Stewart, 1976

It's OK to panic, as long as you do it according to procedure

(Commander Karen Sommerville, Silent Witness: Shadows, 2010)

With all these encouraging prospects in mind, unless the next batch of polls totally contradicts them, the next general election might seem somewhat irrelevant, or inconsequential. Last year concluded with a massive survey conducted by Focaldata, relayed first by The Times and then by The Guardian (the only one not behind a paywall) and The National. With a 22,186 sample GB-wide, it delivers an outcome similar to what I described in my last post of last year: a tie in seats between Labour and Conservatives, with the SNP surging back to 2015 level. Their Scottish subsample must have been around 2,000, but Focaldata haven't published the size of their subsamples, and predict the SNP would bag 57 seats. According to the data file Focaldata have released, with individual projections by constituency, the two 'missing' seats would be Labour holding Edinburgh South and the Conservatives holding Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk, their safest Scottish seat in 2019. This year we have just one poll, from Survation on behalf of Scot Goes Pop, conducted between and January. It shows a surprisingly low level of support for the SNP, both in comparison to previous Commons polls or to the Holyrood polls conducted simultaneously. Here is what we have, with the SNP uncomfortably close to their 2019 result, and what my model makes of that. Here too, I have re-engineered my model to factor in the regional crosstabs, when the pollster provides them. Which Survation does, with result quite similar to their Holyrood crosstabs, but with some differences coming from the different nature of the votes and possibly the personal stature of incumbent MPs.

Unsurprisingly the Conservatives do better than their national average in the North East and the South. This would allow them to hold all three Border seats, plus Banff and Buchan. On a bad day for the SNP, the Tories would also save Wee Andy Bowie in West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, though they might not all be happy at the prospect. And more unexpectedly they could also gain Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock by a rabbit's ass' hair. But Oor Doogie Ross would be kicked out of Moray even if the SNP underperformed. The Liberal Democrats would do better than average in Highlands and Islands, but the SNP also would, so that wouldn't help Jamie Stone, who would lose his seat whichever way the wind blows. But LibDems would also overperform in Lothian and Mid Scotland and Fife, which would allow them to hold Edinburgh West and possibly the ultra-marginal North East Fife. Labour would overperform in Glasgow and West Scotland, which wouldn't help them much at first glance because the SNP are so far ahead in most seats there. But, on a bad day for the SNP, Labour would snatch back Glasgow North East, ironically Anne McLaughlin's seat, whose partner is Graham Campbell, SNP councillor for the Springburn-Robroyston ward of Glasgow and one of most prominent conspirators in Joanna Cherry's demise. And not so surprisingly also East Lothian, which has changed hands twice since the 2015 SNP landslide. I guess some within the SNP would love that, as it would get Chief Maverick Kenny MacAskill out. On a very bad day, Labour could also have a decent shot at Rutherglen and Hamilton West, which also changed hands twice since 2015, and even Inverclyde, which has been in the SNP's hands ever since the 2015 landslide. At the far end on the swingometer and on a good day, the SNP would snatch back Edinburgh West from the LibDems. Plus Banff & Buchan and Dumfries & Galloway from the Conservatives. Which would make Alister Jack the first ever sitting Secretary of State for Scotland to lose his seat to the SNP. Bear in mind that Douglas Alexander, Jim Murphy, Danny Alexander and Michael Moore were no longer Scottish Secretary when they lost their seats to the SNP, though they had been earlier in their career. And Alistair Darling technically never lost his seat as he had stood down before the 2015 election where Joann Cherry gained it, and was anyway also no longer Scottish Secretary at that time.

Finally, just above is the comparison between what my upgraded model delivers from the Survation poll, and what the two other projectors readily available online make of the same polling data. Oddly, Electoral Calculus predicts Labour would gain back Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, which might be mathematically correct based on the 2019 results, which were a political outlier, and uniform swing. But neither Election Polling nor me see it happening, that is unless somebody close to the Stirling University Mafia manages to pull a dirty trick on Neale Hanvey in the name of ideological purity going back seven generations, and I certainly wouldn't put this past that mischievous clique. Then the differences between my revamped model and others are not that big and just stress a situation we already knew existed. The Conservatives being strong in the South, and Labour still doing well in parts of Auld Strathclyde, will come as no surprise to anyone who paid attention. That it could be more damaging to the SNP than generally thought is no real news either. Just a timely reminder that, when you say that no vote should be taken for granted, you have to mean it and act accordingly. I honestly have no idea right now which modeling is the best. I guess we will have to wait until the next election to know if my idea of including regional crosstabs, with the risk involved in smaller samples, was a genuine lightbulb moment or just completely fucking daft. But this next election will possibly never happen, or will it after all?

In Edinburgh, they have salt and sauce

In Glasgow, we have salt and vinegar because we’re classy

(Susan Calman, on QI: Revolutions, 2020)

© Al Stewart, 1973